Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1349

reference
930-tree-1
name
1349
tree-preservation-order

undefined

930-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032968 50.876737)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032897 50.876729,-1.032900 50.876743,-1.032910 50.876756,-1.032926 50.876766,-1.032945 50.876772,-1.032967 50.876775,-1.032989 50.876773,-1.033009 50.876766,-1.033025 50.876757,-1.033035 50.876744,-1.033039 50.876730,-1.033036 50.876716,-1.033026 50.876704,-1.033011 50.876694,-1.032991 50.876687,-1.032969 50.876685,-1.032947 50.876687,-1.032927 50.876693,-1.032911 50.876703,-1.032901 50.876715,-1.032897 50.876729)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL